There is no doubt that, in both cases, the specific characteristics of the game (its formal properties) had a decisive influence. to work out methods of sanction in the event of transgression of a code of behavior likely to put off the popular classes, and which goes hand in hand with the development of the strict rules of amateurism. It doesn’t matter if the distribution of rugby has to be affected: the main thing is to stay “together”. Did not the same phenomenon also play a role in the situation described by Gavin Kitching, explaining that rugby was left behind by soccer in the North East of England? There is no doubt that, in both cases, the specific characteristics of the game (its formal properties) had a decisive influence. to work out methods of sanction in the event of transgression of a code of behavior likely to put off the popular classes, and which goes hand in hand with the development of the strict rules of amateurism. It doesn’t matter if the distribution of rugby has to be affected: the main thing is to stay “together”. Did not the same phenomenon also play a role in the situation described by Gavin Kitching, explaining that rugby was left behind by soccer in the North East of England?
There is no doubt that, in both cases
The specific characteristics of the game (its formal properties) had a decisive influence. It doesn’t matter if the distribution of rugby has to be affected: the main thing is to stay “together”. Did not the same phenomenon also play a role in the situation described by Gavin Kitching, explaining that rugby was left behind by soccer in the North East of England? There is no doubt that, in both cases, the specific characteristics of the game (its formal properties) had a decisive influence. It doesn’t matter if the distribution of rugby has to be affected: the main thing is to stay “together”. Did not the same phenomenon also play a role in the situation described by Gavin Kitching, explaining that rugby was left behind by 무료스포츠중계 in the North East of England? There is no doubt that, in both cases, the specific characteristics of the game (its formal properties) had a decisive influence.
Of course, this does not necessarily mean denying any role to extrinsic factors… On the contrary, it is a question of highlighting the complex articulation between the two dimensions. However, the modalities of this articulation cannot be decided in advance or in any generality: they are closely dependent on the “context” studied. Thus, Maarten Van Battenberg and Jeroen Vermeulen, in their study of the reasons why korfball remained a sport confined to its place of choice (the Netherlands) while basketball, with fairly similar formal properties, is broadcast around the world, list a number of factors that could be described as extrinsic and which revolve around a series of dichotomies: the historical circumstances of the “invention” of each of the two sports and the links between the United States and the Netherlands (notably through the yucca).
The differences between the two countries in terms of cultural influence on the rest of the world
The relatively incongruous mixture, in the practice of football. Of players of both sexes; the opposition between the image of modernity offered by basketball and the traditional connotation represented by korfball. Admittedly, these last two dichotomies have something to do with formal properties, if we are willing to consider that the rules of the game knowingly developed within korfball could only put off a good number of practitioners; but, in this particular context, the weight of extrinsic factors is difficult to dispute.
On the other hand, the case analyzed by Jérôme Soldani represents a very interesting attempt to establish a powerful link between a population’s enthusiasm for a sport and its formal properties. After highlighting the decisive influence of historical facts in the adoption of baseball by the Taiwanese – and more specifically the fact that it is much less of American origin than linked to the Japanese occupation –, Jérôme Soldani approaches the question of “why” by identifying deep affinities between certain cultural traits inscribed in Han Taiwanese society and the formal properties of baseball.
